出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)專(zhuān)題頻道公正性欄目，提供與公正性相關(guān)的所有資訊，希望我們所做的能讓您感到滿意！
06-17
2012新GRE作文范文：審查的公正性
Censorship is rarely， if ever， justified.來(lái)自www.Examw.com
審查很少能夠做到公正。
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic， which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship， which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome， it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma， is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy， or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in， at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech， writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good， it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision， and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy， and the “common good” is the “monarch good”， then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages， both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of God; even now， in some authoritative cou...
02-02
下面是小編為大家搜索整理的有關(guān)新gre作文備考素材，gre寫(xiě)作是美國(guó)所有作文考試中質(zhì)量要求最高的一類(lèi)作文考試，改革后的新gre作文寫(xiě)作題目更加具體，考察考生完成題目的過(guò)程中是能夠融合批判性思維和分析性寫(xiě)作能力，所以我們平時(shí)除了增強(qiáng)語(yǔ)言功底的同時(shí)還要注意素材的積累和提高勤于思考分析的能力。
7 如何判斷法律的公正性
There is no doubt that laws are made for a reason and the laws of a society reflect the values of that society because of tradition, necessity, and expectation. But occasionally there will be a law, which is unjust and wrong though not for everyone but say, for a group of people. If the law contradicts their high morals or religion, it is right for them to protest against it in a reasonable way. So now the question is what is that reasonable way and how to protest against an unjust law? First people have to ask themselves if there is a higher purpose, which make them to disobey it. They should look beyond the intent of the law and immediate results to see what the final result will be. It is not right to disobey an unjust law for just personal convenience. People should look at the alternatives, weigh them against what their personal beliefs may be, and then make a judgment based on their individual moral values.
20 盧梭觀點(diǎn)： 社會(huì)和法律
Should we obey an unjust law? According to the theory of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, 18th century French political philosopher, in a democratic society the state represents the general will of the citizens, and that in obeying its laws each citizen is pursuing his own real interests. Thus, in an ideal state, laws express the general ...
01-19
GRE考試形式：中國(guó)大陸地區(qū)、香港、澳門(mén)、韓國(guó)目前執(zhí)行分開(kāi)考試的形式。由機(jī)考（分析性寫(xiě)作）和筆試（語(yǔ)文、數(shù)學(xué)）組成。
題目：
Censorship is rarely, if ever, justified.
審查很少能夠做到公正。
正文：
“Censorship” is a word which seems to be authoritative rather than democratic, which implies the will of the governors rather than the will of general people. Since the occurrence of the censorship, which could be traced back to the Ancient Rome, it has been playing an important part in the domestic affairs while arousing applause and condemnation as well. Here the our government faces a dilemma, is it fair to carry on the censorship at the cost of sacrificing part of democracy, or just open the gate letting flows of ideas and thoughts in, at the risk of losing its own rampart.
Since censorship suggest an act of changing or suppressing speech, writing or any other forms of expression that is condemned as subversive of the common good, it must have a close relationship with the one who applies such supervision, and the word “common good” should be redefined under different conditions. There is time when we were all under a powerful monarchy, and the “common good” is the “monarch good”, then the censorship itself is the instrument of the monarch which solely depended on the will of the monarch; in the Middle Ages, both the Roman Catholic and the Protestant Churches practiced censorship that seemed to be oppressive to any ideas challenging the doctrines of churches and the existence of...
【出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)liuxue86.com】審計(jì)院日前對(duì)治安部隊(duì)的管理提出批評(píng)，惹得多數(shù)派怒火中燒。多數(shù)派反過(guò)來(lái)指責(zé)審計(jì)院法官立場(chǎng)“政治化”。在此情形下，法官們不再沉默。
法新社報(bào)道，審計(jì)院上周四(6日)公布了一份報(bào)告，對(duì)治安部隊(duì)的管理提出尖銳批評(píng)，對(duì)2002年薩科齊出任內(nèi)政部長(zhǎng)以來(lái)犯罪率下降表示質(zhì)疑。
審計(jì)院報(bào)告甫一公布就招致內(nèi)政部長(zhǎng)蓋昂的震怒。他斥責(zé)審計(jì)院的報(bào)告“多處不確切，有分析錯(cuò)誤，也有遺漏”，缺乏“客觀性”。多數(shù)派好幾名負(fù)責(zé)人也指責(zé)報(bào)告有失公允。
審計(jì)院第一院長(zhǎng)、薩科齊任命的前社會(huì)黨籍國(guó)民議會(huì)議員迪迪?！っ赘晷Q(chēng)，這份報(bào)告是“確切客觀的，是集體研究的成果”，“我不明白為何引起如此雷霆大怒！”
逾百名人民運(yùn)動(dòng)聯(lián)盟(UMP)和新中間派國(guó)民議會(huì)議員立即致函米戈，“譴責(zé)”審計(jì)院“一種陰險(xiǎn)的政治化現(xiàn)象”。他們還對(duì)報(bào)告作者與社會(huì)黨的關(guān)系提出“嚴(yán)重疑問(wèn)”。
審計(jì)院法官協(xié)會(huì)發(fā)表公報(bào)，深表“驚愕”。審計(jì)院的法官們挺身而出為自己的報(bào)告辯護(hù)，這是極為罕見(jiàn)的事。
法官協(xié)會(huì)主席讓-呂克·勒布伊宣稱(chēng)，這樣表態(tài)是“相當(dāng)罕見(jiàn)的”。他還說(shuō)，“審計(jì)院的報(bào)告引起一些人這樣激烈的反應(yīng)，這也是相當(dāng)罕見(jiàn)的。這種形勢(shì)畢竟很反常。”
法官協(xié)會(huì)還指出，“這些反應(yīng)質(zhì)疑了某些法官和報(bào)告人的公正，毫不猶豫地提到審計(jì)院的工作政治化”。協(xié)會(huì)“反對(duì)這些懷疑法律機(jī)構(gòu)獨(dú)立性的斷言?！?/p>
審計(jì)院法官認(rèn)為，這些反應(yīng)“表明這些人對(duì)財(cái)政司法機(jī)構(gòu)運(yùn)作方式基本不了解，有的是真不了解，有的是假不了解”。他們重申他們的“三大基本原則”，即“獨(dú)立、辯駁和集體制”。
這些財(cái)政法官特別指出，“所有公之于眾的報(bào)告都不是那幾個(gè)人決定的結(jié)果，而是審計(jì)院共同決定的結(jié)果”。這份有爭(zhēng)議的報(bào)告“是審計(jì)院最‘莊嚴(yán)的’機(jī)構(gòu)——‘參事庭’通過(guò)的。參事庭會(huì)議是所有庭長(zhǎng)和審計(jì)長(zhǎng)都要參加的，在此情況下，也就是有上百名法官。”
反對(duì)派也鞭撻政府及其多數(shù)派的這種反應(yīng)。有些人，如社會(huì)黨初選候選人馬努埃爾·瓦爾斯或社會(huì)黨國(guó)民議會(huì)議員弗朗索瓦·龍克爾甚至要求蓋昂辭職。
社會(huì)黨領(lǐng)導(dǎo)層吁請(qǐng)內(nèi)政部長(zhǎng)“著手解決治安差問(wèn)題，而不是攻擊審計(jì)院”，并借此機(jī)會(huì)揭露“政府說(shuō)的與我們國(guó)家治安手段減少的現(xiàn)實(shí)之間存在明顯的矛盾”。
06-11
2011年06月11日 04時(shí)02分，《考試信息網(wǎng):上海高考最大限度保證評(píng)卷準(zhǔn)確公平性公正性》由出國(guó)留學(xué)網(wǎng)liuxue86.com編輯整理.
登記分?jǐn)?shù)和加分等都在網(wǎng)上進(jìn)行，26日20時(shí)起可查高考(微博)成績(jī)。
2011年全國(guó)普通高校招生統(tǒng)一考試昨天落下帷幕。據(jù)悉，全市1300余名教師參與的評(píng)卷工作已陸續(xù)展開(kāi)。6月27日上午，本市將通過(guò)郵政專(zhuān)遞向考生公布高考成績(jī)；6月26日20時(shí)起，考生可通過(guò)網(wǎng)絡(luò)或聲訊電話提前查詢(xún)成績(jī)。
今年高考語(yǔ)文、數(shù)學(xué)、英語(yǔ)(論壇)(主觀題部分)、歷史、政治科目將實(shí)行網(wǎng)上評(píng)卷，答案須書(shū)寫(xiě)在專(zhuān)門(mén)設(shè)計(jì)的答題紙上。按照流程，網(wǎng)上評(píng)卷前，由掃描儀將考生書(shū)寫(xiě)的答案掃入計(jì)算機(jī)存儲(chǔ)，計(jì)算機(jī)將答卷按設(shè)計(jì)的條塊分割成若干部分。評(píng)卷時(shí)，計(jì)算機(jī)將掃描件隨機(jī)發(fā)送到評(píng)卷教師的電腦屏幕上。網(wǎng)上閱卷時(shí)，每一題均由兩位教師分別評(píng)閱，兩位教師的評(píng)分誤差如果在規(guī)定范圍內(nèi)，即取平均值；如果超過(guò)規(guī)定范圍，計(jì)算機(jī)則再將試題發(fā)送給第三位教師評(píng)閱，第三位教師的打分再與前兩位教師的平均分作比較，誤差控制在設(shè)定的范圍內(nèi)。市教育考試院表示，網(wǎng)上評(píng)卷提高了評(píng)卷質(zhì)量，使評(píng)分更加公平、公正。答卷的保管、傳送，登記分?jǐn)?shù)、加分等步驟都在計(jì)算機(jī)網(wǎng)絡(luò)上進(jìn)行，能最大限度保證成績(jī)準(zhǔn)確。
公正性推薦訪問(wèn)
