出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)專題頻道北美范文欄目，提供與北美范文相關(guān)的所有資訊，希望我們所做的能讓您感到滿意！
GRE詞匯量大，閱讀量大，寫作難度也比較高，做事也總有方法，怎樣取得GRE高分的作文呢。把難點(diǎn)逐個(gè)拿下，把GRE掌握在手中，就不怕不怕啦，寫作不怕啦，閱讀不怕啦，考試就不怕啦。下面是由出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)為您整理的GRE中的作文范文，《GRE北美范文：選修專業(yè)是否值得重視》。新GRE作文題庫中什么類型的作文題目都存在，我們需要知道各方面的知識(shí)，看看范文也能從中獲得幫助。
GRE北美范文：選修專業(yè)是否值得重視
"Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study because acquiring knowledge of various academic disciplines is the best way to become truly educated."
I fundamentally agree with the proposition that students must take courses outside their major field of study to become "truly educated." A contrary position would reflect a too narrow view of higher education and its proper objectives. Nevertheless, I would caution that extending the proposition too far might risk undermining those objectives.
The primary reason why I agree with the proposition is that "me" education amounts to far more than gaining the knowledge and ability to excel in one's major course of study and in one's professional career. True education also facilitates an understanding of one- self, and tolerance and respect for the viewpoints of others. Courses in psychology, sociology, and anthropology all serve these ends. "True" education also provides insight and perspective regarding one's place in society and in the physical and metaphysical worlds. Courses in political science, philosophy, theology, and even sciences such as astronomy and physics...
本文主要講解GRE作文相關(guān)內(nèi)容，希望能幫助童鞋們提高寫作能力。出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)liuxue86.com編輯部敬上。
gre滿分作文北美范文全揭秘。學(xué)習(xí)GMAT/GRE寫作往往離不開“北美范文”，但其中良莠不齊，并非篇篇能稱之為“范”，畢竟它們不是ACT/ETS所欽定的文章。如此說來，Official Guide上的范文就彌足珍貴，無論6分的還是5分、4分的都要仔細(xì)分析，尤其是其中所給與的分析和評(píng)論更是要細(xì)細(xì)體味，領(lǐng)悟其精神，然后用心實(shí)踐。
GRE下面是一篇官方給出滿分的ARGUMENT范文，我們來一起賞析，看看它為何能scored six (先讀文章，再看我的點(diǎn)評(píng))
The following appeared as part of an article in a daily newspaper:
"Most companies would agree that as the risk of physical injury occurring on the job increases, the wages paid to employees should also increase. Hence it makes financial sense for employers to make the workplace safer: they could thus reduce their payroll expenses and save money."
Discuss how well reasoned you find this argument. In your discussion be sure to analyze the line of reasoning and the use of evidence in the argument. For example, you may need to consider what questionable assumptions underlie the thinking and what alternative explanations or counterexamples might weaken the conclusion. You can also discuss what sort of evidence would strengthen or refute the argument, what changes in the argument would make it more logically sound, and what, if anything, would help you better evaluate its conclusion.
GRE
感謝您閱讀《gre滿分作文北美范文全揭秘 》一文，出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)(liuxue86.com)編輯部希望本文能幫助到您。本文主要講解GRE作文相關(guān)內(nèi)容，希望能幫助童鞋們提高寫作能力。出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)liuxue86.com編輯部敬上。
GRE末端
In conclusion, while at first it may seem to make financial sense to improve the safety of the work environment sometimes it truly does not mak...
本文主要講解GRE作文相關(guān)內(nèi)容，希望能幫助童鞋們提高寫作能力。出國留學(xué)網(wǎng)liuxue86.com編輯部敬上。
issue167范文
"It is impossible for an effective political leader to tell the truth all the time. Complete honesty is not a useful virtue for a politician."
Is complete honesty a useful virtue in politics? The speaker contends that it is not, for the reason that political leaders must sometimes lie to be effective. In order to evaluate this contention it is necessary to examine the nature of politics, and to distinguish between shor-term and long-term effectiveness.
On the one hand are three compelling arguments that a political leader must sometimes be less than truthful in order to be effective in that leadership. The first argument lies in the fact that politics is a game played among politicians-and that to succeed in the game one must use the tools that are part-and-parcel of it. Complete forthrightness is a sign of vulnerability and naivete, neither of which will earn a politician respect among his or her opponents, and which those opponents will use to every advantage against the honest politician.
Secondly, it is crucial to distinguish between misrepresentation of factin other words, lies-and mere political rhetoric. The rhetoric of a successful politician eschews rigorous factual inquiry and indisputable fact while appealing to emotions, ideals, and subjective interpretation and characterizations. Consider, for example, a hypothetical candidate for political office who attacks the i...
北美范文推薦訪問
